Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Politics and Culture - February 2008

Propaganda Still Sells Wars

February 29th 2008 07:01
Propaganda is a useful tool of the government to sell wars. As the character O’Brien declared in George Orwell’s novel 1984, “He who controls the present, controls the past.” Good ole Henry Kissinger famously said, “Perception of reality is sometimes more important than reality itself.”

Last summer the Bush administration formed a group named Freedom’s Watch (FW) to propagate support for the on-going occupation of Iraq. Prominent neo-conservatives from the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) created the group. On August 22, 2007 FW released a statement announcing it will “spend approximately $15 million on radio and television ads…aimed at ensuring Congress continues to fully fund the troops with the ultimate goal of victory in the War on Terror.”


FW President Bradely Blakeman said, “The mission of Freedom’s Watch is to ensure a strong national defense and a powerful effort to confront and defeat global terror, especially in Iraq.” He went on to say, “Those who want to quit while victory is possible have dominated the public debate about terror and Iraq since the 2004 election. Freedom’s Watch is going to change that.”

Former White House press secretary and FW cofounder, Ari Fleischer describes FW as “Ideologically inspired by much of Ronald Reagan's thinking: peace through strength, protect and defend America, and prosperity through free enterprise.”

The list of FW’s important members reads almost as a ‘who’s who’ of influential neo-conservatives. The inner sanctums of the group are people close to Vice-President Dick Cheney or past Bush administration employees. Blakeman served as President George W. Bush’s former deputy assistant. He joined the Gordon C. James Public Relations firm in May 2006 as a senior advisor in its Washington, D.C. office. According to the firm’s press release, Blakeman “served as… senior coordinator for logistics for the Bush-Cheney recount in Florida, and senior lead advance representative for the Bush-Cheney 2000 election.”

The August 22 press release listed among its “supporters”: Anthony Gioia, Kevin Moley, Mel Sembler, and Howard Leach. Gioia, Moley, Sembler, and Leach served as ambassadors for Bush. Moley also served various positions in former President George H.W. Bush’s administration, including Vice Chairman of the President’s Council on Management Improvement. Sembler’s website states that he is a “financial supporter of the Bush clan.”

White House Iraq Group

Freedom’s Watch is not the first propaganda group the Bush administration has created. The White House Iraq Group (WHIG), formed in August 2002 by White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, served to bolster support for invading Iraq. The Constitution in Crisis, a report on the Bush administration by Rep. John Conyers, characterized WHIG as “an apparent effort to bolster public support for war with Iraq.”

The Washington Post quoted a senior official who participated in WHIG in an August 2003 article as saying it was “an internal working group, like many formed for priority issues, to make sure each part of the White House was fulfilling its responsibilities.”

A month after being formed, the Bush administration began a media ‘blitzkrieg’ to support invading Iraq. During the month of September Bush mentioned Iraq frequently in speeches, characterizing Saddam Hussein’s regime as a “true threat to world peace” and capable of “far greater horrors” than the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. In October 2002 Congress authorized the use of military force against Iraq.

Reagan’s Office of Public Diplomacy

In 1983 President Ronald Reagan appointed Otto Juan Reich to be the director of the Office of Public Diplomacy for Latin America and the Caribbean (OPD). The Office of Public Diplomacy existed until 1986. Author and activist Noam Chomsky described the Reagan administration’s purpose for establishing the OPD as a means “to manufacture consent for its murderous policies in Central America,” in his book Hegemony or Survival.

A number of governmental reports reveal the activities of the OPD during its three-year tenure. A letter written on September 30, 1987 by then Comptroller-General of the U.S. found the OPD’s activities to be “prohibited, covert propaganda activities… beyond the range of acceptable agency public information activities.” The same letter said the OPD violated “a restriction on the State Department’s annual appropriations prohibiting the use of federal funds for publicity or propaganda purposes not authorized by Congress.”

The November 1987 bipartisan report of the Congressional Iran-Contra committees found that “n fact, ‘public diplomacy’ turned out to mean public relations-lobbying, all at taxpayers’ expense.”

The House Foreign Affairs Committee wrote a report on September 7, 1988 which summarized investigations into the OPD. The report stated that “senior CIA officials …military intelligence and psychological operations specialists from the Department of Defense, were deeply involved in establishing and participating in a domestic political and propaganda operation.” Those connected with the OPD “raised and spent funds for the purpose of influencing Congressional votes and U.S. domestic news media,” according to the report. The report concluded that “many of the key individuals involved were never questioned or interviewed by the Iran/Contra Committees.”

Despite Elliot Abrams 1991 indictment for his role in the Iran-Contra scandal, President Bush appointed him to be the Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for Global Democracy Strategy. Bush’s father, President George H.W. Bush, pardoned Abrams on Christmas night 1992.

President George H.W. Bush’s Desert Storm Propaganda

During the fall 1990 run-up to the 1991 invasion of Kuwait to oust Iraqi forces, known as Desert Storm, the U.S. main stream media reported a story by a 15-year old Kuwaiti girl know as Nayirah. She testified before Congress and described how she saw Iraqi troops storm the Kuwaiti hospital where she worked as a volunteer, and steal incubators leaving 312 babies “on the cold floor to die.” Seven senators referred to the incubator story during the debate to authorize the use of force. President George H.W. Bush mentioned the story five times, characterizing the supposed incident as “ghastly atrocities” and “Hitler revisited.”

Several weeks before the U.S. dropped bombs on Iraqi forces in January 1991, a few reporters began to question the validity of the incubator story. It later turned out that Nayirah was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S. and never volunteered in the Kuwaiti hospital she mentioned in her story. The famous public relations firm, Hill and Knowlton coached her and others in a $10 million contract with the Kuwaitis to sell Desert Storm to the American people and Congress.

President George H.W. Bush’s national security advisor, Brent Scowcroft said the incubator story was “useful in mobilizing public opinion” although they “didn’t know it wasn’t true at the time.” Scowcroft served as Bush’s Chairman of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board from 2001 to 2005.

President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Propaganda Groups

The Vietnam War was not popular, to say the least. In order to sell the war to the American public, by 1967 President Lyndon B. Johnson created two groups: the White House Information Group and Citizens Committee for Peace with Freedom in Vietnam. The two groups worked “to consolidate favorable news coverage,” according to historian David Brinkley.

The White House Information Group consisted of White House staff members who provided “more effective and better coordinated information to those seeking to defend U.S. policy,” as William Conrad Gibbons stated in his book The U.S. Government and the Vietnam War. The role of the group was to “gather information” and work with “information officers at the State and Defense Departments to coordinate and improve the flow of information.” The Citizens Committee was “a citizens’ organization to campaign for the administration’s policy.”

WWI’s Committee on Public Information

While Europe was embroiled in World War One, President Woodrow Wilson asked journalist George Creel to head up the Committee on Public Information (CPI) in 1971, commonly referred to as the Creel Commission. The purpose of the CPI was to market the war to the American people who were reluctant to get involved, or in the words of historian Howard Zinn, “It was a massive effort to excite a reluctant public.”

In order to market the war, the CPI enlisted the help of the entertainment and advertising industries. The CPI developed and trained a nationwide group of public speakers dubbed the “Four-Minute Men” who went into movie theaters or other public places and delivered four minute speeches urging their listeners to support the war effort by donating to the Red Cross, joining the military, or buying Liberty Bonds. The Four-Minute Men delivered 7,555,190 speeches in 1917 and 1918, according to the CPI’s records.

The CPI produced a multi-media marketing blitz. Filmmakers were recruited to produce pro-war films. Pamphlets called “Red, White and Blue Books” were published which contained essays in support of the war. Posters were created which urged people to support the war effort by buying Liberty Bonds or enlisting in the military. The most famous poster featured Uncle Sam sternly pointing his finger, with caption, “I Want You.” CPI issued over 6,000 press releases and 200,000 “lantern slide” shows.” Boy Scouts delivered copies of Wilson’s speeches door-to-door. Churches, schools, and other organizations were used to disseminate CPI brochures and other literature.

In Creel’s 1920 account of the CPI, titled How We Advertised America, he wrote that the “war was not fought in France alone…It was the fight for the minds of men, for the conquest of their convictions.” He noted that “there was no part of the great war machinery that we did not touch, no medium of appeal that we did not employ.”

“It was in recognition of public opinion as a major force that the Great War differed most essentially from all previous conflicts,” Creel wrote in a 1922 essay. Since then U.S. presidents have made use of the weapon called the mainstream media to manipulate public opinion. In the words of Noam Chomsky, presidents like to “manufacture consent” for war.
70
Vote
Shared on
   


Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), Chairman of the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee, subpoenaed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Friday requesting documents reviewed by the agency’s administrator Stephen L. Johnson before he stopped California’s tailpipe emissions law. The law would force automakers to cut carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emission by 30 percent in new cars and trucks by 2016.

California sought a waiver request to override the EPA’s standards, and was denied in December. The federal law only raises fuel economy standards to 35 miles per gallon by 2020 while California’s law would raise it to 36.8.

California filed a lawsuit against the EPA in December as did the state of Washington.

In November California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger said, “California is ready to implement the nation’s cleanest standards for vehicle emissions, but we cannot do that until the federal government grants a waiver allowing us to enforce those standards.”

Twelve other states adopted California’s laws, and three others said they plan to adopt them.

EPA spokesman Jonathan Shradar said, “What they've subpoenaed is to get control of documents that they have seen every word of. They know what it says,” Shradar said. “I'm not going to imply that they would turn them over to those currently in litigation, but that is a concern.”
California is the only state with the right to set tougher emissions standards under the Federal Clean Air Act as long as the EPA gives it a waiver.
59
Vote
Shared on
   


Bush's State of the Union Address

February 6th 2008 07:47
President George W. Bush gave his last state of the union address on January 28, 2008. Lawmakers and political experts of various political persuasions called it modest, with Bush covering issues from the economy to education.

David Gergen, former advisor to the Reagan and Clinton administrations, called Bush’s address “a modest speech with modest goals.”

The economy

“In the long run, Americans can be confident about our economic growth, but in the short run, we can all see that that growth is slowing,” Bush declared during the beginning of his address.

“I wish that was true,” Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) said about Bush’s remark. “Over three million manufacturing jobs have been lost, including more than 10,000 in my State of Vermont,” Sanders continued.

Bush called for a stimulus package which calls for tax cuts.

“You and I know that a temporary fix is only the first step toward meeting our challenges and solving our problems,” Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius said during the Democratic response to the address.

Since President George W. Bush took office in January 2001 the income disparities between the richest and the poorest have increased. For the first time in 2006 everyone on the Forbes 400 list was a billionaire. The 2005 Forbes 400 list contained 374 billionaires, with a combined net worth of $1.13 trillion. No new editions were added to the 2005 list.

The minimum net worth needed to make the list went from $500 million to $625 million in 1998. In 1999 the Forbes 400 list had as much wealth as bottom half of U.S. population, over a trillion dollars. The average Forbes 400 member increased their wealth by 177 percent in the last decade, and more than 55 percent in the last two years.

A 2004 study by UC Berkeley professor Emmanuel Saez reported that the income of the median household in 2004 only increased by 1.6 percent. During the 1998 to 2001 period it increased by 9.5 percent.

The New York Times conducted a study on the 2003 tax cuts. They found that someone earning $26 million paid the same amount of taxes as a $200,000 to $500,000 wage earner. In a time of record federal deficits, when the U.S. military occupies two countries (Afghanistan and Iraq) Bush’s tax cuts make little sense.

Health care

Bush vowed to make “health care more affordable and accessible for all Americans.” To accomplish that goal Bush proposed “ending the bias in the tax code against those who do not get their health insurance through their employer.” He claimed that would “put private coverage within reach for millions.”

Bush called on Congress to “expand health savings accounts, create association health plans for small businesses, promote health information technology and confront the epidemic of junk medical lawsuits.”

Bush’s proposals to make health care more affordable are out of touch with what the majority of Americans think, according to national polls. Sixty-four percent of those polled in October 2007 said they preferred universal health insurance, even if it meant higher taxes. When 1,229 adults nationwide were asked in January 2006 if health insurance should be guaranteed for everyone, 62% said yes.

The World Health Organization (WHO) ranks the U.S. as 27th in the industrialized world for infant mortality. The average life expectancy, according to the WHO, in the U.S. is age 78, ranking 25th among industrialized nations. The average number of good health years is 69, also ranking 25th, and below Slovenia. According to the Institute of Medicine, 18,000 deaths in the U.S. are caused by lack of health insurance.

A 2005 Commonwealth International Survey on Sicker Adults found that one-half of U.S. adults said they did not see a doctor when sick, and could not afford recommended treatment. According to the study, one-third of U.S. patients spent over $1,000 in out of pocket expenses compared to 13% of British patients.

“The gap between U.S. and Canadian spending on health care administration has grown to $752 per capita,” a 2003 study published by the New England Journal of Medicine said. The study suggested that “a large sum might be saved in the United States if administrative costs could be trimmed by implementing a Canadian-style health care system.

A 2007 Commonwealth study titled, Mirror, Mirror on the Wall found that the U.S. health care system is the most costly in the world, but “underperforms on most dimensions of performance, relative to other countries.”

Free trade

Bush called on Congress to pass trade agreements with Peru, Colombia, Panama, and South Korea. “We're working to break down barriers to trade and investment, wherever we can,” he said as he proceeded to tout the benefits of free trade agreements.

The North American Free Trade Agreement, the first free trade agreement between the U.S. and another nation, established a free-trade zone in North America. Signed by the United States, Canada, and Mexico in 1992, it took effect on January 1, 1994, but immediately lifted tariffs on the majority of goods produced by the three participating nations, and called for the gradual elimination of most trade barriers over a 15-year period.

According to the Economic Policy Institute’s 2001 report, “Mexican wages have decreased 27% since NAFTA, while hourly income from labor is down 40%.”

The 2001 report by the Economic Policy Institute also found that when Mexico began NAFTA negotiations it had “noncompetitive production costs… due to higher prices for inputs such as diesel and electricity, higher financial costs, and higher marketing costs (due to deficient infrastructure in highways and warehouse storage…among other factors).”

Economists at the National University in Mexico City wrote a study that cited 13.3 million workers in 2000 earned less than around $3.93 a day. The study also mentions that labor production’s part of the Gross Domestic Product has decreased from 34.16% to 30.66%.
NAFTA is only the beginning of free trade agreements between the U.S. and other governments. The Central American Free Trade Agreement, ratified by both houses of congress during the summer of 2005, includes the United States, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the Dominican Republic.

CAFTA is seen as a stepping stone to the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas which would include every Latin American country (except Cuba) and the U.S. The FTAA itself is a stepping stone to the Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) which would include the countries in the western and eastern hemisphere.

Central America and the Dominican Republic make up the second largest U.S. export market behind Mexico, and is the 10th largest U.S. market worldwide. The combined Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Central America is equal to less than 0.5 percent of the U.S. GDP.

Environment/energy

“To build a future of energy security, we must trust in the creative genius of American researchers and entrepreneurs and empower them to pioneer a new generation of clean energy technology,” Bush said. The clean technologies Bush went on to site include coal and nuclear energy.

“And let us complete an international agreement that has the potential to slow, stop, and eventually reverse the growth of greenhouse gases,” Bush proclaimed. “This agreement will be effective only if it includes commitments by every major economy and gives none a free ride,” he continued.

“Any presumption that the crisis of global warming can be met through voluntary measures is a fantasy,” Karen Wayland, legislative director of the National Resources Defense Council said. “Anything less than science-based, binding reductions in global warming pollution isn't going to meet the challenge.”

The Framework Convention on Climate Change was adopted in 1992, and the Kyoto Protocol on December 11, 1997. There is a distinction between the two: the Framework encouraged developed countries to curb greenhouse gas emissions, but the Protocol commits them to it.
The Protocol requires developed countries to lower greenhouse gas emissions and meet targets within five year period of 2008-2012. The reductions must add up to five percent of 1990 emissions.

Most countries agreed to the Protocol, but the U.S. and Australia, among other countries, did not. Australia finally agreed to the Protocol on Monday, December 3, 2007.

“While the launch of negotiations and a clear deadline of 2009 to end the negotiations would constitute a breakthrough, anything short of that would constitute a failure,” Indonesian Environment Minister and President of the Conference Rachmat Witoelar said.

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) released a report February 2007 which indicated that the amount of carbon dioxide emissions has increased. The U.S. is five percent of the world’s population, but in 2005 was responsible for 22 percent of worldwide carbon dioxide emissions, according to the report. Bush did not mention that fact.

Iraq

Speaking of the U.S. military presence of Iraq, Bush said, “The terrorists and extremists are fighting to deny a proud people their liberty and fighting to establish safe havens for attacks across the world.”

Bush went on to discuss the troops surge. “One year ago, our enemies were succeeding in their efforts to plunge Iraq into chaos, so we reviewed our strategy and changed course.” He continued, “We launched a surge of American forces into Iraq. We gave our troops a new mission: Work with the Iraqi forces to protect the Iraqi people, pursue the enemy in his strongholds, and deny the terrorists sanctuary anywhere in the country.”

Bush failed to mention his 2003 State of the Union address in which he made many claims concerning Iraq, namely that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and supported terrorist networks (including al-Qaeda). The previous year Bush made the assertion during a speech in Cincinnati, Ohio that surveillance photos showed Saddam Hussein’s regime were rebuilding factories where it had once produced WMDs.

Scott Ritter, the UN's top weapons inspector in Iraq until 1998 when he resigned because he thought President Clinton was too easy on Saddam, wrote a number of editorials for various American newspapers. In a July 20, 2002 piece for the Boston Globe he cited his experience as a weapons inspector, insisting that Iraq had a “90-95 percent level of verified disarmament.”

Ritter further stated that all chemical weapons Iraq produced before 1990 “would have degraded within five years” except for mustard gas. The same goes for biological weapons which “would have neutralized through natural process within three years of manufacture.” Monitoring of Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons from 1994 to 1998 did not produce “any evidence of retained proscribed activity” by Iraq to reproduce chemical and biological weapons.

Charles Duelfer, the man the Bush administration chose to complete the investigation of Iraq’s weapon’s programs, wrote in a report released in 2004 that Iraq’s ability to produce nuclear weapons had “progressively decayed” since 1991, and no “concerted efforts to restart the program” had been discovered by inspectors.

In October 2004 Duelfer told a Senate panel, “We were almost all wrong [on Iraq].” Duelfer’s report concluded that Saddam Hussein “aspired to develop a nuclear capability, but “The former regime had no formal written strategy or plan for the revival of WMD after sanctions.”
Greg Thielmann, the top intelligence official at the U.S. State Department until resigning shortly before the invasion of Iraq, considered the stories that Iraq was attempting to purchase uranium from Niger “bad intelligence…it was something that made no sense, in terms of the structure of the country that was allegedly planning to provide the uranium.”


65
Vote
Shared on
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
77 Posts dating from December 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Brandon Gay's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Brandon Gay
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]